Long-term anthropogenic food provisioning can negatively alter the natural behavioural patterns (social and spatial) of wildlife. For example, it can increase intra- and inter-species aggression or significantly reduce the home ranges of animals. The intensity of these ecological impacts is linked to the quantity and frequency of the provisioning. This has mostly been studied in terrestrial context and wildlife tourism, but information is lacking for recreational fishing. New South Wales in Australia provides the perfect set-up to study this, as recreational fishers are obligated to land their catch. To facilitate this, local councils provide fish cleaning tables where fishers can process their catch. Fish cleaning generates a highly predictable food source that wildlife can scavenge on. Building on our previous work, this study used passive acoustic telemetry paired with high-definition video analysed by an artificial intelligence device at a fish cleaning table to examine the link between fish cleaning activity and the movement patterns of three fish species: yellowfin bream (Acanthopagrus australis), luderick (Girella tricuspidata) and smooth stingrays (Bathytoshia brevicaudata). Luderick (herbivore) did not respond to provisioning, whereas bream (omnivore) and stingrays (carnivore) altered their behaviour in response to provisioning. Fish cleaning activity and fish movement patterns were analysed along with several environmental (daily rainfall, moon phase, current speed, sea surface temperature, tidal range) and temporal predictors (time of day, day of the week). Results suggest recreational fishing waste can have impacts both at the individual and population levels, with consequences cascading throughout the ecosystem.