Oral Presentation Australian Society for Fish Biology & Australian Freshwater Sciences Society Conference 2026

Adaptive governance, trust, and social licence in reef fish recovery (145668)

Dannie D O'Brien 1 , Shannon J Burchert 1 , Alexander Basford 1
  1. Northern Territory Government, Channel Island, NT, Australia

The recovery of depleted fish stocks is framed as a technical challenge of selecting appropriate management measures. Achieving recovery outcomes in highly valued recreational fisheries also depends on maintaining community trust, legitimacy, and willingness to comply with management interventions. In 2026, the Northern Territory Government undertook a large-scale public consultation to inform recovery planning for depleted stocks of popular recreational reef fish, Golden Snapper (Lutjanus johnii), in the Greater Darwin region. The consultation combined an open public survey, a representative population survey, choice modelling, written submissions, and stakeholder engagement to examine community responses to alternative recovery strategies.

 

Fishing was consistently identified as an important component of the Territory lifestyle, identity, and community wellbeing, with strong support for ensuring future generations have access to the fishery. Concerns regarding fairness, confidence in science, trust in management, and the social and economic impacts of restrictions emerged as dominant themes. While respondents broadly supported stock recovery, support for management interventions declined as measures became more restrictive, spatially extensive, or longer in duration. Choice modelling demonstrated that support and intended compliance were not static responses to specific management tools but instead varied according to the broader governance package in which those tools were implemented. Even management measures viewed as restrictive received substantially greater support when combined with proactive enhancement activities, visible compliance and enforcement, transparent reporting, and ongoing education and engagement. Respondents also consistently favoured targeted, staged, and adaptive approaches over broad-scale restrictions.


These findings suggest fisheries recovery is not solely a biological challenge but a social-ecological transition requiring adaptive governance. Trust-building, transparent reporting, visible enforcement, and collaborative stewardship can function as management levers that influence social licence and intended compliance. Integrating these governance elements into recovery programs may improve the effectiveness and durability of recreational fisheries management during periods of environmental and social transition.